22 caliber guns

 

Gentle reader,

Once again, thank you for taking the time to look over my blog. Nice to know I'm not wasting my time. This one falls outside my usual subject of collecting.

If  you follow my blog, you have seen the airsoft gas pistols I had: Two versions of the venerable
Colt 1911 45 automatic and two Beretta M9 9mm military automatics.

I sold three of them, well all of them, but one guy never paid for the GI version of the 1911 so I kept it.

My wife is a gun owner. She five semi-automatic pistols, a 357 magnum revolver and a pump shotgun. The latter for home defense. Something we pray we will NEVER need!

I too am now a gun owner. I like to punch holes in targets, (thus the reason for buying airsoft guns)
but am not interested in hunting (her either) nor shooting anything that is alive. So, I decided to go with 22 caliber guns. 

One of Nancy's is a 22 caliber version of the 1911. It is made in Italy by Chiappa Firearms. Many companies sell 1911 pistols in various calibers: 45, 40, 9mm and a number of 22 LR (long rifle).
She really bought it for me to shoot. I wasn't ready to be a REAL gun owner until recently.

Being a guy, I played army as a kid. I joined the Air Force, but they found a heart murmur during the physical. It has since disappeared. So, naturally, I think military styled rifles are the ones to have. The latest trend is 22 LR caliber versions of the AR-15 and just about any military-type rifle. One of the more expensive AR-type rifles in full caliber, in this case (The SCAR 17s / SCAR-H fires a 7.62x51 NATO round. Also designated as .308 Winchester, is made in Belgium by Fabrique Nationale. I'm told by my nephew, who owns the civilian version, that it too fires NATO 5.56mm or civilian 223 rounds.) is called a SCAR. Note the width of the ejection port above the magazine in the image below. Long empty shells come out of there. 

Below, courtesy of Google, are some images of a FN SCAR:


As you can see, the butt stock folds to one side. Also, as seen in the second image, the butt stock has a "cheek weld" that can be raised. Called that because your cheek should be tight against it.

Now, images of the 22 LR version made in Germany for ISSC-Austria: 

See the TINY ejection port on the ISSC? It's clearer in the second image from the bottom.

Left side view. Below is the magazine loaded with 22 LR rounds.
Below is the changes I have made to it to make it "tacti-cool". Green laser mounted where a bipod would usually mount. Folding front vertical grip which makes it easier to hold. Tactical single-point sling. 
 Below, you can see the ejection port which also has the serial number on it. QUITE a bit smaller.
As you can see, it is ambidextrous, (hey, I spelled it right, first time!) with the safety switch on both sides as well as being able to have the cocking handle on the left or the right side in one of six locations.

I bought mine from a New York gun dealer via gunbroker.com. It was shipped to my local gun dealer where I went through the background check before being able to take it home.

What I did not know, is that New York has similar laws to California: 10-round magazines maximum and non-adjustable stocks. So, my butt stock does not fold nor extend or collapse.
Below is a comparison photo of a full-sized airsoft Viet Nam era M16 rifle (with orange tip) verses the ISSC which is much shorter in length.
Above and below as a visual aid are photos of a military 5.56mm round verses a 22 LR round and a 6mm airsoft round. 
So, you can see while the 5.56mm (civilian version is .223 inches in diameter) is sharper and has a huge cartridge. Here is a link to an excellent web page comparing 22 LR verses 223 rounds:

Below, are the 22 LR Chiappa 1911 and Airsoft 6mm 1911. Plus their magazines. 1911 pistols are usually "single stack" magazines, although some are "double stack" using 9mm rounds. It requires a wider grip. The airsoft pistol is double stack as you can see. The vast bulk of the magazine contains the pressurized gas that propels the 6mm ball rounds. 
 
The real pistol on the left came with a "fake suppressor" which screws on the barrel extension. Using rifle rounds in a pistol can upset the accuracy, but with the device attached it doubles the barrel length which improves accuracy.

Below, courtesy of the above web page link is a photo of:"From left to right: 45ACP, 9mm NATO, .22LR, .223, 7.62x39mm"  The SCAR 17s / SCAR-H fires a 7.62x51 NATO round. 
Also designated as .308 Winchester.
Which is different from the fat one on the right. 
I stand corrected. Thanks Matt!
Note the huge size difference of the 45 ACP on the left 
and the 22 LR in the middle! Holding their empty
cases it is even more impressive a difference. 
 
Once again, thank you for reading my blog. Perhaps now you can understand why I choose the tiny 22 LR round to target shoot. Oh, plus the rounds are SO cheap to buy!

Scott 

PS:  I just read the linked web page from top to bottom including the MANY comments. The last commenter stated this:

"223, in .223 Remington, does not denote the diameter of the bullet. .223 Remington and 5.56x45 NATO use .224" (5.7mm) bullets. Other cartridges that use .224" bullets are .221 Remington Fireball, .222 Remington, .22-250 Remington, .224 Weatherby Magnum and 5.7x28." 

PPS:  My nephew, Matt, a SCAR owner, has sent me photos of his VERY customized SCAR: 









Matt, is former US Army soldier extrordinaire. I don't know exactly what he did in the Service, BUT, do know that he is one of those brave (some might say crazy, or as said here in the South:
"tecthed") souls that went to Iraq then Afghanistan working as Security protecting our Military Service members and other US Citizens.  He is extremely good at what he does and I know of no one that is more of an expert in weapons and their effective use than is Matt. He's the kind of guy that would not only walk down a dark alley in the worst part of town, at night, he'd LEAD the way.

He also forwarded "a short "consumer report" paper I wrote for my first English writing class that gets to the nuts and bolts of the weapon system without too much technical jargon."See below:



"Fabrique Nationale Special Operations Forces Combat Assault Rifle (SCAR)

The SCAR effort emerged in early 2003 as Belgium owned and operated Fabrique Nationale d'Herstal entered into the competition when U.S. Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) opened competitive bidding and design submission for a new combat assault rifle specifically designed for the operational needs and environments of the various Special Operations Forces operating around the world. The chosen weapon would replace the currently issued M4 5.56 carbine and therefore would need to be designed for compatibility with nearly all components of the SOPMOD (Special Operations Peculiar Modification) accessories. The chosen company would “…provide the first 21st-century modular assault rifle designed and built from the ground up for the finest fighting forces in the world." (Gourley 2006)
Of the nine major weapons manufacturers that submitted multiple designs for testing, the Fabrique Nationale (FN) SCAR design was the only weapons to successfully pass the rigorous testing phase and be unanimously chosen by the selection board of every Special Operations Forces (SOF) component. With a test phase including over two million fired rounds, in a wide range of extreme environments and conditions, the SCAR weapons system is one of the most heavily tested weapons systems in small arms history. ("Defence Review Asia" 6)
Fabrique Nationale is not just sticking with the military market, and through its US division, FNH USA, is now offering the same reliability, accuracy, and versatility of the U.S. SOCOM newest service rifle in a semi-automatic only version available on the civilian market. Designated the FN SCAR 17S and chambered in 7.62x51mm NATO (308 Win.), the FN SCAR is designed to the exact same military standards and has been through the exact same testing trials. The FN SCAR 17S is a short stroke piston gas operated semi automatic assault rifle for the civilian sport shooting enthusiast or collector, with a magazine capacity of 10 or 20 rounds.
Although also offered in 5.56x45mm NATO, and designated as the FN SCAR 16S, the 17S packs a more robust and hard hitting round, and while tipping the scales at just less than 8lbs unloaded, the SCAR 17S is one of the lightest full sized 7.62x51mm rifles available on the civilian market today. The side folding telescoping stock is constructed of rugged polymer and is fully adjustable for height, and six separate positions for adjusting the length of pull, making this rifle not only light, but adjustable to the shooter in almost any position, and collapsible for easier transportation to and from the range.
Additionally, the SCAR 17S also features a 1 in 12 twist rate, free floating, cold hammer-forged 16in barrel with a hard chromed bore that is interchangeable with a shorter 13in barrel1 within minutes, should the need arise. The gas system is adjustable for use either with a suppressor or without, and the reciprocating external charging handle can be switched to either the left or the right side, depending on the preference of the shooter.
1 Requires separate purchase and proper BATF SBR licensing/tax compliance 

The relative weight of the bolt carrier and rotating bolt to the rest of the system balances the rifle, and results in a “softer shooting” rifle for a full sized 7.62x51mm platform, which combined with the specially designed muzzle brake, allows for quicker target reacquisition and re-engagement.
Along with the shooter being able to swap the charging handle to his or her preference, the safety selector switch is ambidextrous to equally accommodate either left or right-handed shooters. The receiver integrated optical rail and accessory rails give the rifle a solid feel while maintaining the light weight of the rifle, and gives the shooter the option of adding accessories as needed.
A proven performer in military trials, and now offered in a semi automatic version, the SCAR 17S is a full sized, light weight, individually adaptable, and highly accurate weapons system now available on the civilian market, for the collector or sport shooting enthusiast.
Works Cited
"The Fn Scar Reaches Final Milestone." Defence Review Asia 4.3 (2010): 6. International Security & Counter Terrorism Reference Center. Web. 6 June 2012.

Gourley, Scott R. "Special Operations Forces Combat Assault Rifle." Army 56.5 (2006): 73-4. ProQuest Military Collection; ProQuest Research Library. Web. 6 June 2012. (Gourley 2006)"

Once again, THANKS, MATT!


Coming full circle


Gentle reader,

First off, thank you for taking a look at my blog. I don't often post new ones, but see over 200,000 page views so far! That may not be many compared to a lot of blogs, but mine has limited subjects.

Now, as for the title, way back in April, 1995, when Nancy and I were "an item" and I for the first time since 1980, had a tax refund all my own. It wasn't much, but I didn't have to use it to pay bills!
Since seeing my friend, Shawn Burn using a 35mm SLR back in the 1970's to make photos of us playing Ultimate Frisbee, I've wanted a "real" camera. I.e., a 35mm SLR. 

I went to a pawn shop, (my first time!) and bought a used Olympus OM-10 with 50mm f1.8 lens and a cheap flash, all for $100. I knew NOTHING about cameras. Previously, (in what Nancy and I refer to our prior marriages) "in a former life", all I'd had experience with was a JCPenney 110 camera. Truly, point and shoot. As a kid in the 1960's I had a green plastic camera that used roll film. I came across pictures from it years later and had no idea what was in the photos. It too, was point and shoot. Plus, I was a kid!

So, it didn't occur to me that the little switch marked: OFF ON needed to be turned to ON! Olympus to the rescue! They knew an idiot like me would buy one and try to make pictures with it.
So, they designed it to turn itself on if the shutter was pressed and then off after. Lucky for me! 
The first photo was of Nancy sitting cross-legged, wearing the corduroy pants she'd worn in high school, making a little tree out of wire, a rock and tiny "leaves" made from tiny green stones.

If you've seen previous posts, obviously, camera collecting was a passion and I learned a LOT about making photos. Now, with tens of thousands of photos under my belt (no wonder it's so hard to fasten it!) and having mostly gone digital, what do I mean by "coming full circle"?

In our favorite thrift store, I came across a mint Olympus OM-10 with 50mm f1.8 lens in it's leather case. I'm talking new condition. WOW! Bought it! Then, the next week, they had an OM-1MD as well! That one was Olympus' first 35mm SLR and requires a 1.3 volt mercury
battery which they don't make anymore. But, it had the faster (larger maximum aperture) 50mm f1.4 lens.

Since I have the Voiglander Bessa R with a passel of lenses and the Nikon N90S which shares all but one lens with the digital D70S, why would I want another film camera? Nostalgia. Plus, with my greatly increased knowledge and cheap lenses proliferate ebay, why not?    

Since then, I wanted the "manual adapter" that was optional for the OM-10 and allowed one to be able to choose the shutter speed rather than letting the camera set the speed based on light and aperture chosen. Each time I bid on one on ebay, someone else wanted it more.

Then, I saw an all black OM-10 which included the manual adapter, body cap, motor winder, 2X lens converter, a cheap flash and in two pieces, an Olympus flash as well as a camera bag and ALL the manuals and paperwork from the original buy who was a Sailor and bought it in Hong Kong in 1983. Price? $19.95 what is the general price for the least expensive manual adapter alone!

I decided to keep the black one and combined the 50mm f1.4 lens from the OM-1MD with all but the flashes and the 2X. I had bought via ebay a Vivitar zoom telephoto lens and zoom wide angle lens. I have posted the OM-10 on ebay and the OM-1MD along with most that came with it plus the long Vivitar and selling the wide angle zoom separately. 

I have posted photos below to show the differences in the chrome verses black OM-10s. Plus the huge difference in the size and versatility as well as quality of the standard Vivitar telephoto zoom and the higher scale Soligor C/D lens.










Both zooms are "constant aperture" which means at the short end (70-75mm) and the long end (205-220mm) the amount of light passed remains the same. Most zooms nowadays are variable aperture. The more you zoom out, the less light reaches the film or sensor.

The Vivitar is 75-205mm f3.8 and the Soligor is 70-220mm f3.5. Look at the photos and the Soligor is HUGE compared to the Vivitar, yet it is only 20mm "longer" as far as magnification over the "normal" 50mm lens. 




Now, in Vivitar's defense, they did make better lenses called "Series 1". I do not have one to compare, but I suspect it still wouldn't be as well made or need a 72mm sized filter and have a tripod mount. Most unusual for a 200mm length lens.        

Lastly, due to the different lengths of the two lenses, the above images of the front and rear of the lenses, the shorter Vivitar is out of focus. Nonetheless, you can clearly see the different sizes of the front elements and the close size of the rear elements. f3.5 verses f3.8, how much light transmission difference?

By the way, that huge Soligor came in it's own leather case with both factory caps and a 72mm UV filter all for $24.95. I also bought the companion Soligor 28-80mm zoom lens which is variable aperture. Both Soligors have separate Macro adjustment rings which move internal elements for close focus. Naturally, the telephoto has much more magnification!

Thanks for looking!

Scott    

My car made the cover of Autoweek, & Car & Driver &.....



Gentle reader,

As you have been following my blog, you know I love my car from the land-down-under: 1991 Mercury Capri XR2. Sporty, Mazda-powered, turbocharged, RED convertible.

Well, as it was the first car EVER imported from Australia, and it followed the then-modern recreation of the classic sports car, Mazda's MX-5 AKA: Miata, it was quite a news event. Making the cover of all the large American car magazines in July, 1990 and scooped by AutoWeek
all the way back in May. It was an exciting new car, the second in a hopefully expanding field of convertible automobiles. 

You may not be old enough to remember that Detroit thought that the convertible would be outlawed by the Federal government as unsafe and the 1975 Cadillac Eldorado was declared:
"The LAST convertible." Investors snapped them up and put them away hoping to cash in on them
years later. They didn't.

As you no doubt can see anytime you go outside, the convertible is far from dead. But, back in1989/1990, the Miata and Capri were setting the car world on fire. Fun driving was back!

Naturally, there were numerous Miata/Capri XR2 comparison tests. It was unfair for both as each was created for a different reason. The Miata (MX-5) as a pure, i.e., rear wheel drive, sports car of the English mode of years long past. The Capri was front wheel drive, had a "back seat" of sorts and thus was a different car. Sporty, not "Sports". Faster than the Miata due to it's turbo.

I recently scored two car magazines from the past: May, 1990 Autoweek, and May, 1993 Car and Driver. The former has a nice shot of "my" car, which was built in May, 1990, and the latter showing the Miata, Capri XR2, Honda Del-Sol and Alfa Romeo Spider Veloce. All in red.




 Below is an article from a year later in AutoWeek:


 I don't know how to MERGE photos in Photoshop, so two-page spreads will be separated.
 Below is an article from Collectible Automobiles. What month and year? I don't know:




Above is the cover with the following article:





 Below is the cover from the Car and Driver that I just got with the comparison test following. Take a look at the performance specs and the Capri XR2 out performs all the other cars, yet only finished 3rd. Albiet, ahead of the Alfa!









 Going back the July, 1990, the month my Capri was delivered to the original owner, here's Car and Driver's take on the new car from the land of OZ.








 Below is the cover from July, 1991 of Car and Driver. The article explains that you really should opt for the XR2 because the standard Capri is a non-performer.




Below is the cover of Motor Trend, also from July, 1990:









Below is an article from a UK (English) publication called Performance Automobiles. I don't know the date. Interesting the see the home market Capri, badged as a Ford and without a driver's air bag on the steering wheel. Also note the two-tone paint job. Not sure I like it:







Below is the cover and article from Road and Track from July, 1990:









 
So, if you took the time to read all those articles, Congratulations, you know now far more about my car and it's brothers than you ever wanted to.

Again, thanks for taking the time to look at, read and follow my blog. I am truly pleased that you have taken the time to do so.

Scott

Whatever Happened to the Police Cars in 1970's TV Show ADAM 12? We May Have Found One!

  August 1, 2026 #550 Gentle reader, I am in my 70th year on this planet. Therefore, I have lived in eight decades. We grew up (once our par...