Earbuds In-Ear Verses Over-Ear Headphones Which Ones Sound Better?

 October 8, 2026

#553

Gentle reader,

I have been in the best-sounding-enjoyment-of-recorded-music-I-can-afford, hobby for fifty years. I do not recall how many headphones I have owned in all those years, but it was not a lot. I prefer listening to speakers. 

However, today, I DO have two pairs of very nice, but not very expensive ones. The ones below are neither of them. Although, I admit, when I saw SENNHEISER headphones on a thrift store shelf, I was excited! I will quickly show you a few of the more desirable ones I have found in the past.

I was hoping to find a generic non-AI photo of headphones and in-ear headphones together. But, every one I found was from a major website. I did not want to be accused of stealing an image. 
Since I did not have a real (real, to me, meant a 35mm SLR) camera until 1995, (believe it or not, cell phones, especially "smart" ones did not always exist!) it was one of these. 

And, since it never occurred to me to take photos of everything I own (film, developing and printing were expensive) I did not keep records of things I used to own. Plus, I had NO idea that someday (in 2008) I would decide to write a blog.
KOSS was always a good American brand of headphones. These were their HV1A models I found these (and almost everyone which I am showing you here and below) in a thrift store, much to my delight. I found replacement foam pads for them. As you can see, I had to replace the 1/4" plug. This was before I knew about things like heat-shrink tubing, to make it look neat.
I had quite forgotten about most of the ones I am showing you. I sold them all to others via eBay, years ago. I just looked these (AKG K 66) up:

"Experience the fusion of comfort and sound quality with the AKG K 66 Stereo Headphones, a staple in the world of music gear for those who appreciate high-fidelity audio without breaking the bank. Crafted with a semi-open, circumaural design, these headphones deliver a beautifully natural and uncolored sound, making them perfect for both casual listening and detailed mixing sessions. The self-adjusting headband and plush leatherette ear pads ensure you enjoy a snug fit, while the lightweight build means you can wear them for hours without discomfort.

Whether you're in the studio or simply unwinding with your favorite tracks, the K 66 headphones promise an immersive audio experience with their powerful 40-mm speakers. These headphones boast a frequency range from 18Hz to 22kHz, covering the full spectrum of sound with clarity and precision. With an efficiency of 112dB SPL/V and a rated impedance of 32 ohms, they deliver sound that’s both powerful and nuanced, suitable for a variety of devices and audio interfaces." 

The text is from an ad for these headphone. Incredible specifications! Of, course sound at 112 decibels would be fatal!

"AUVIO" is Best Buy's in-house electronics accessories brand. I did buy these new. They fold to make them more compact. I don't recall whether they sounded good or not.
Another wonderful KOSS find! Their PRO 4A models. Their rubber cushions had collapsed. I was able to find new pads, but they were smaller since KOSS shrunk the PRO 4A's size! I managed to stuff the new pads inside the old ones.
Now these, were bought new and at a bargain price, some years ago!

I saw them advertised in a magazine at a store some distance from where I lived. Not a store one would associate with audio equipment either. I don't remember the name. They advertised them as "JDM Audio Technica AIR ATH700 headphones!" ATH-AD700 | Audio-Technica 

"JDM" stands for Japanese Domestic Market. Which means they were not meant to be sold outside of Japan. How those people got ahold of a number of them, I have no idea. The store wanted just $57 a pair, for them. They rested on your head rather than clamped onto your ears. 53mm or two inch diameter drivers are quite large for headphones. I enjoyed them for YEARS until one day, the left channel just stopped working. I then looked for replacements for them. Now sold outside of Japan, they had changed their design somewhat and are now called: AIR ATH AD700X. You will see more of them later on.

I have another pair of KOSS now, which I am listening to right now. You will see them as well, in a little bit. 

The idea for this article started when I went to eject a CD from the optional in-the-glove-box CD player in my 2013 Cadillac ATS Performance 2.0T.
That is the car's official name. It simply would not eject the CD! "Oh, well," I thought, "the car is thirteen years old with 165,000 miles on it..." As a retired automotive and electro-mechanic, I figured, "How hard can it be to replace it?" Actually not hard at all. Above the photo of my car, is a General Motors official drawing of all the parts associated with the Cadillac ATS' glove box. The CD player bolts inside of part number 10, above.

This is the official GM photograph of the factory replacement CD player.

Installing the new CD player, which I bought from GM Parts Giant was a breeze. However when I started the engine up, instead of the CUE screen image below...
The screen was black with Theft Locked displayed 
on the screen front and center. "What the fudge?!?" said I. Well, not that exact word.

I contacted my wonderful Service Writer/Friend Patrick, at the local GM dealership's service department and told him the problem. "Oh, no! We may or may not be able to fix that!" NOT what I wanted to hear. The part was guaranteed to fit my vehicle. Fit it does, work, it does not!
I realized that I could use my ancient, bus still working SONY Car Discman similar to the one above, with some compact headphones until I can get the car to the shop. Nothing associated with the CUE system would display. Kind of like the cars or yore I used to drive.
While police traffic enforcement is largely nonexistent in our town (and from what I hear from out-of-state friends, we are not alone in that regard, I did not want to advertise that I was wearing headphones while driving. BTW: These are the compact KOSS headphones I am wearing right now.
So, I started looking for some fancy in-ear ones, hopefully, with the best sound. What I found on eBay is above. KZ Duonic is the brand of these particular ones. What I was not counting on was the USB-C plug on on the end of the cable instead of a 3.5mm plug!
A close-up of the things inside each of them.
"KZ Duonic Extra Bass - Industry First Three-Magnetic Planar Driver Earphones" from one of the eBay auction pages.

Once plugged into a DIGITAL audio source,  they sounded really good too. But, definitely lacking in bass, despite the ads.

Very impressive specifications, too!

If you type "Quality in-ear headphones" into eBay's SEARCH line, you will see many variations of this type of headphones with many different brands and components within their bodies and a wide variety of prices for essentially the same products.
To make them easily visible as to which ear is which, I used a red marker on the right one.
"Surely," I thought. "There must be a USB-C to 3.5mm plug adapter out there somewhere. And, I found one, seen below.
When I plugged the adapter into an analog source, no audio! It could not possibly be as simple as that! There would have to be an Analog to Digital Converter in the "biaze". Which of course, there is not.
"Okay," I thought. "That idea failed." I started looking for Android in-ear headphones, which greatly narrowed the search, since most have USB-C plugs. I wanted metal bodied ones as well. 
These were found on "the jungle site". They are of metal construction and have a "twisted pair" cable. Obvious that the Chinese company used "Ferrari Font". That is an actual thing, see below:
See? I'm not making this up. Oh, that little black bag (above) has a spring-loaded metal inside the opening within which one can store their headphones. It's tricky to get and hold open to insert or remove the coiled 'phones.
The model number of these particular headphones is SP3060. The Union Jack (the flag of Great Britain) intimates that Sephia is a British company. It's Chinese.
A closer look at the construction of the Sephia SP3060 in-ear headphones.
The clear outer insulation makes it easy to see the twisted pair of wires inside.

There are also many different "brands" of almost identical headphones of this particular design on eBay, and no doubt on the jungle site too.

So, how did these nicely made in-ear headphones sound? "Bright" is a good word for them. Complete and utter lack of lower frequencies. If I pressed them into my ears, there was a semblance of bass. But the rest of the sound became muddy.

I expanded my search on eBay by adding the word: BOSE.
Now, the name BOSE has gotten tossed around quite a bit. "No highs, no lows, must be BOSE." is a frequent chant. Years ago, my wife bought me a pair of BOSE 301 speakers (then their top-of-the-line) hoping I would use them instead of the massive speakers I had in the living room. I did not. However, eventually, I mounted them in this room and wrote about it here: 
The Robb Collections: A GREAT way to mount your BOSE 301 speakers for excellent sound!  That was thirteen years ago. The do lack bass and highs, but don't sound that bad.
Okay, "massive" is an exaggeration. Our living room is not that large. Note how she put plants one every thing! One must meet the "Spouse-Approval Test" when putting electronics in the main room of the house. She was delighted when I moved the stereo into what we now call the Den.
WAY back in the Day, being able to own a pair of BOSE 901 speakers was a lofty goal. A couple years ago, my brother-in-law had a pair, WITH the original boxes and the equalizer. He offered them to me for FREE! The caveat being all 18 drivers needed new foam. I thanked him, but declined. You see, to fully enjoy BOSE "Direct-Reflecting" speakers, they must be set up like below. The Model 301 speakers are also "Direct-Reflecting" and thus, must be set up the same way.
Sorry for going off on a tangent. My readers are used to my doing that. What was I writing about, again? Oh, yes, listing to in-ear headphones in my car.
This is one of the eBay seller's images of one of the hundreds of used wired BOSE SoundTrue and SoundSport headphones he was selling.
These are the BOSE SoundTrue in-ear headphones I purchase from him. The last pair available. Some eBay sellers have NOS* models and want almost $500 for them! The seller I bought them had these plus SoundSport models. He had hundreds of them. All were tested, thoroughly cleaned and a set of three pair different sized new silicone adapters were included. *New Old Stock.
They have a built-in volume control and a microphone. Once I tried and selected the best fitting silicon ear adapters and figured out how to orient them correctly so that they snap on the headphones, they fit very well and snugly. How is the sound? In a word: FANTASTIC! They are very detailed, with crisp clear highs, tight bass and no distortion at all. Frankly, I am thrilled with them! Will THEY deliver super deep bass. No.
I showed you the back of this box to show you how obvious it is to see someone wearing them while driving. Not that local law enforcement would notice... KOSS, brilliantly decided to start making these long-discontinued headphone models again. I love them!
Again, anyone who listens to headphones of any type at higher than 89 decibels will miss their hearing in later years. 
My replacement for the JDM Audio-Technica 
AIR ATH700 headphones, now called ATH700X. A size comparison, above, next to the KOSS Porta Pro models.
A direct comparison of the originals and current (all black) models. These rested on one's head. One would not even want to walk with these on! The new ones do grip the ears but only enough to keep them on.
A side view to compare the two of them. Both sound great, but for comfort and long listening sessions, the larger ones are not fatiguing in anyway.
Not what one expects to see on the back of a product available in the USA: Lots of Japanese characters. 
And, finally, the front of the box which the large headphones made their journey from Japan to the east coast of the United States residing within.

To conclude: Do in-ear headphone sound as good as on-ear, especially larger drivers ones? Based upon my VERY limited comparison, no. TINY drivers required by "ear buds" and the all-metal models I tried, simply are physically unable to reproduce sounds from 20Hertz (DEEP bass) to 20,000Hertz (beyond what most musical instruments can produce) due to their diminutive size. The makers can put several drivers like the digital ones I bought via eBay, in them, but still they just can't move enough AIR to recreate true bass frequencies. 
This is one of the large speakers I had in the living room which prompted my wife to buy the BOSE 301 speakers. Turns out, they are pretty rare. Note the three different sized drivers. A fifteen inch woofer, for bass frequencies (they CAN move a LOT of air!) the five inch midrange speaker, for, middle frequencies and, in the case of these speakers, a horn tweeter for high frequencies. TINY in-ear "buds" or any other type simply cannot move all frequencies, no matter who makes them or how much one spends to buy them. It's physics. 

Thank you for taking the time to read this rather long article. I hope that your learned some things from it. Feel free to comment below, or via Facebook.

Scott Robb
October 8, 2026
#553

Super Rare December, 1975 24 Page Full Color Dynaco Dynakit Products Catalog!

 September 17, 2026

#552

Gentle reader,

For those that are new to this blog: Welcome! I write about Nancy's and my passions, and no, not that kind of passion. Our collections. One of my main, since I was a kid, I'm now 70, is building a great sound system on a budget.

NOTE to the reader about best viewing: I write this on a Windows 11 PC using a 27 inch monitor. For best results for viewing the images, I recommend using some kind of non-handheld device. Click or tap on any image and a new window will open over this one with the image full sized. The text in the catalog is quite small and will be hard to read, otherwise.

A quick history: It all started in 1975, in Richmond, Virginia when I made a new friend. 
His name is Philip Stubbs. That was him, on the far right. This was the 1970's so, long hair had a firm hold on us back then. It is making a resurgence with some of the male youths of today. Anyway, Philip took me up to his room, inside, I beheld the BIGGEST speakers I had ever seen! Then, I saw a REVOX reel-to-reel tape deck, a big Pioneer integrated amp and more. He put on Pure Prairie League's LP Two Lane Highway. When that blast of loud and CLEAR music hit me, I knew that I was doomed: to a lifetime of trying to be able to reproduce such an epic sound in my home.
I was reading Stereo Review and High Fidelity magazines at the time and saw a small ad in the back of both magazines for the book pictured above. When it arrived, I was surprised how large it was! It was unbiased and not beholden to advertisers. I read it cover-to-cover and chose Dynaco equipment based upon: Quality, sound and affordability. 
I did not own a camera for many, many years. This image is from 1995. Seen is one of  the Dynaco A25 "floor model" speakers I bought from Dixie HiFi fifty years ago. Behind the farthest pot can be seen the PAT-5 preamplifier kit I built. I bought a matching FM-5 tuner to match it somewhere local. 

I wrote a letter to Dynaco and they sent me their brand new catalog which is what I am featuring in this article. 
While I would like to claim that this image is of the SAME catalog, that would be a lie. As time marched on and I was finding more and more equipment to play with, I sold my catalog on eBay. Years later, I regretted doing so. All I could find was one in black and white. Until recently, that is.

As noted at the top of this article, the text is quite small.
 

I can attest to the claim above. 

This image is NOT from this Catalog, although a much smaller version is featured in it. It is to demonstrate just how thoughtful Dynaco engineers were at creating POSTER sized wiring diagrams which clearly show where each and every wire goes.


As previously stated, I bought and built their new top-of-the-line preamplifier kit, the PAT-5. A view inside of it is seen above.
Those components were stacked for the photo, not during use. After eventually buying and enjoying a Dynaco: ST-120 and then a ST-150 power amplifier, (the former was dual mono in one chassis!) via eBay, I was able to finally get my hands on the mighty ST-400! Three of the original knobs were missing and the wrong kind of fuse holders were in it, but it worked and at last, it was mine!
I put the one original all-metal knob on eBay and someone gleefully bought it.

At the time (1976), I could not afford to buy a Dynaco ST-120 60 WPC Power Amplifier kit. I instead chose to buy two SWTPC* Tiger 0.1 60 watt mono power amplifier kits. They were way less expensive and, it turned out, harder to build. They did not last long. *Southwest Technical Products Corporation. See below it's catalog number.
This image is from an eBay auction for ONE Tiger 0.1 60 watt mono amplifier. Rather forlorn looking too. Their chassis width was set so that four mono amps, side-by-side, would fit in a standard 19 inch rack. Quadraphonics was in back then. 

YEARS later, I attempted to recreate that original stereo system. A Dynaco PAT-5 was easy to find. Not so, working, Tiger .01 amps. I settled for a stereo 35 WPC version power ampifier in one chassis. Links to the two-part article are here: The Robb Collections: Reliving the 1976 sound of Dynaco PAT-5 preamplifier and SWTPC power amplifier! and The Robb Collections: PART TWO: Reliving the 1976 sound of Dynaco PAT-5 preamplifier and SWTPC power amplifier!
I would (no pun intended) to have loved to have the optional walnut wood case for my PAT-5. Mine PAT-5 had the later, silver faceplate, verses the goldish faceplate above.
Full-bore (and price) deluxe ST-400 with meters, a cooling fan and rackmount brackets.
A photograph of the "guts" of the Stereo 400 power amplifier.
The "budget" ST-400, simpler controls. less fusing, simpler heatsinks of the Stereo 410.
In case you haven't picked up on it, Dynaco named their power amplifiers based upon watts-per-channel, combined. ST-120: 60 WPC, ST-150: 75 WPC, etc. Stereo 150's above, deluxe in the front.
Their first solid-state preamplifier, the PAT-4 (#4 after their last tube model: PAS-3) with FM Tuner in their double-height walnut cabinet.
Dynaco also made upgrades for some of their kit products.
Left half of the "Centerfold" image of the catalog.
Right half. Shown on these two pages was their entire Speakers line.
A very concise explanation of Dynaco's patented Aperiodic "vent" cabinets.
The continuation of their speaker's design philosophy.
As mentioned above, Quadraphonic Sound was THE thing in the 1970's.
Their AF-6 AM/FM stereo tuner beneath SCA-80 (40 WPC) integrated amplifier.
Their least expensive power amplifiers are described and shown, above. 

Below, are images of the dual-mono ST-120 I bought via eBay.
Obviously, someone with electronic modification confidence combined two ST-120's power supplies into one chassis. This thing was HEAVY!
It all fit neatly in the chassis, however.

I was not crazy about the way they designed the smaller Dynaco power amplifiers as far as how they laid out the connectors goes. 

No way to put it with other components since the power switch and cord enters in one side and the inputs and outputs come in on the other side. I did not keep this amp for very long.
I just looked for other photos of ST-120s online. Where there is a toggle switch now, there once was a black fuse holder. The toggle switch was to turn on the second power supply.
One of THE rarest of vintage Dynaco solid state equipment is the QSA-300 quadraphonic power amplifiers. Especially the deluxe model with the four meters. 75 watts per channel of quadraphonic fun. Basically, two Stereo 150's in one chassis plus the Dynaquad circuitry.
The last of their Tube Dynaco equipment available new in the mid-1970's. The PAS-3X was the latest (from 1966) tube preamplifier. The Mark III was a monaural 50 watt power amplifier. According to the catalog it was a twenty-year-old design. The Stereo 70 survives to this day. 20 WPC from 50 (not 20) Hertz to 20,000 Hertz. 
Again, look at how small the font is! Remember, just click or tap and there it is, BIG.
Detail specifications, for sure!
The inside of the back cover. Note the tiny image of the poster-sized wiring chart for the Stereo 400 power amplifier kit.
I made this, the back cover, original size, to show you all the details not visible, even if the smaller images are clicked or tapped on.  The Quadapter unit at the top came out late in 1960's. While not a true quadraphonic, the sound produced is interesting. More on that later.

Dynaco, the original company was formed in 1955. Here is what Wikipedia's article says about it at the end:
 

"Dynaco was acquired by ESS Labs, LLC in 1979; the Dynaco division was closed in 1980 and its assets acquired by Stereo Cost Cutters (later called Sound Values and Sound Valves).

In 1991 the Pan Orient Corporation (later Panor Corporation) acquired the Dynaco trademark, and in 1993 began marketing electronic audio components with the Dynaco brand. Panor introduced some new products, such as the Stereo 70 II. Panor/Dynaco's most ambitious stereo tube amplifier was the Stereo 160, a 75 wpc, all-tube stereo power amplifier with switchable pentode/triode modes, adjustable tube bias potentiometers, and 6550 output tubes.

While Panor owns the Dynaco brand name and trademark, there is no longer any direct connection with the company founded by David Hafler.

As of 01/30/2026 Dynakit, LLC now owns the Dynaco US trademark."

When I saw a small add in Stereophile magazine in the early 1990's about the NEW Dynaco, I (again) wrote them a letter requesting information. This is everything they sent me. All I could afford back then was their modern, five-channel iteration of the original Dynaquad Quadapter. 
Over time, I bought one of every upgrade to this unit, ending with the QD-2, below.
The previous owner sprayed something on the faceplate which I never could get off.
Unlike the QD-1 iterations, the QD-2 has proper metal three-way binding/banana terminals instead of the cheap spring terminals. I still use it to this day. It is the last Panor-era Dynaco equipment I still use.

Plus, the QD-2 does some amazing things. Sometimes, all of a sudden, there is a musician right next to my chair playing their instrument!
I have written extensively about Dynaco previously. Those articles are some of my most popular. Just Google: The Robb Collections Dynaco and all kinds of links will show up.

Below is all BONUS content. Feel free to keep reading.
Thanks to eBay, I finally was able to afford Panor-era Dynaco equipment. I started with a Stereo-200 power amplifier, left, above. Years later, the left channel started cutting out, I figured it was heat related. With the added fan atop it, that solved the problem for years. To it's right is the QD-2, nestled to the left of the PAT-6 Preamplifier/Tuner. I still have the PAT-6. It sits inches from me on a shelf to the right of where I am sitting typing this. I even found the remote control for it and the factory owner's manual on eBay one day!
As of 2025, this is most of the current system. I replaced the Dynaco PAT-6 with a 1990's American-designed-and-built B&K Components, LTD, Sonata PRO-10 preamplifier and matching ST1400 power amplifier (not shown above). The latter lost one channel(!) and I decided to replace it with a new (I've bought 98% of all the audio equipment over the last fifty years USED) Marantz MM7025 stereo power amplifier. Their LAST stereo unit made. I wrote a review of it.
After getting the Marantz settled into the system. I took a look at the insides of the ST1400 and found one of the four fuses open. I realized they were from 1991 and replaced all four of them with quality new ones. That fixed it! 
This is a black and white image of the rear of a 
B&K Components, LTD, Sonata PRO10 preamplifier. Note the THREE stereo outputs on the left. One pair of XLR and two RCA stereo pair outputs. That means it can drive THREE stereo power amps! Unprecedented!
First, I put the 
B&K Components, LTD, ST1400 power amplifier on the floor in front of the Classical records shelf. I used it to drive the ONLY vintage Dynaco equipment I still enjoy: my A25XL speakers. I snagged them for $99 via eBay. I couldn't believe that no one else bid on them!
A wide-angle lens shot of the listening room before all the amplifier dramatics. The ST200 had two pairs of outputs.
One set drove the large black front and rear speakers through the QD-2. The second set drove the Dynaco A25XLs in stereo. 

The front black speakers are the LAST Cerwin-Vega! speakers made in the USA: Model LS-12. Super efficient and fantastic sounding.

The rear speakers are British designed Tannoy C88 tower speakers. Through the Dynaco QD-2 they make the room sound like no two speakers alone could ever produce.
Later on, I bought a Chinese designed stereo tube amplifier for less than $280 via eBay. I wrote a review of it here: 
The Robb Collections: World Premiere Review of Douk Audio's Exciting new Class A DJ587 Tube Stereo Power Amplifier!
Soon after that, my new next door neighbor offered me his father's home theater equipment. At first, I was hesitant, no room. But, when I saw KLIPSCH, I said, "Yes, I will take everything off of your hands. I wrote about that here: 
The Robb Collections: Having Friends Who Are Neighbors is a Wonderful Thing! Gifted Klipsch Speakers And More.
I added this DOUK Audio beast to the system which allows me to drive either the Dynaco or Klipsch speakers separately or at the same time, by either of the power amps! 
ALL three of these pairs of speakers have super sensitivity. All (in an anechoic chamber) put out mid-90's decibels from ONE watt! The Chinese amplifier puts out a whopping FOUR watts per channel. With any of the speakers, turned up the tiny tubes make it too loud to stand! WHEW!

Well, if you have made it this far, congratulations! No, seriously, I truly appreciate each and every one of my readers. I had NO idea that anyone, let alone almost a million people would want to read anything by me. But, you do. And, I cannot thank you enough. 

Feel free to leave a comment below, or via Facebook.

Scott Robb
September 17, 2026
#552

Earbuds In-Ear Verses Over-Ear Headphones Which Ones Sound Better?

 October 8, 2026 #553 Gentle reader, I have been in the best-sounding-enjoyment-of-recorded-music-I-can-afford, hobby for fifty years. I do ...