I have finally gotten THE SACD player! Sometimes called Universal Players.

Gentle reader,

I, no surprise to my wife Nancy, have bought and sold numerous "Universal Player" devices over the years. 

"What is a universal player?", you may ask. It is a disc player that plays most if not all of the formats that have been developed and sold that use the ubiquitous five inch plastic disc that first came out as a music CD. 

Other than music CDs they will play some of these: DVD video, DVD audio, Kodak Picture disc, CD video, HDCD and SACD. The latter stands for Super Audio Compact Disc and the former: Hybrid Digital Compatible Device. Of course there is also BluRay and the now defunct HD-DVD formats as well. This list doesn't include the multiple recordable versions of CDs and DVD that PCs use. Each type of disc uses a different size, type or color of laser to read their format.

It can be said that those five inch clear plastic disc with a layer of aluminum sandwiched inside has come along way since SONY and Philips co-invented it in the early 1980s. 

The CD or Compact Disc digital audio format is limited in it's audio range because they chose the 44.1KHz sampling frequency. Audible sound can be heard by most people from the very deep Bass which vibrates at 20 Hertz or cycles-per-second, to the upper most Treble that reaches 20,000 Hertz or 20KHz. I will not go into sampling rates and all the other technical mumbo-jumbo that the science involves. There are other web sites for that.

The "pits" in a CD which hold the ones and zeros of music or data are quite large compared to DVD and Blu-Ray discs. Those pits are TINY. So they can hold WAY MORE ones and zeros which allows for gorgeously detailed video and multi-channel sound all in that five inch piece of plastic.

Two camps, (three if you include the still-in-it's-infancy, Blu-Ray-Audio format) of audio engineers decided to try and improve the audio CD's sound. One group chose the DVD format and created DVD-Audio. The other camp, again SONY and Philips, chose the same sized disc with smaller pits but called it SACD. 

SONY won that format war with their SACD triumphing over DVD-Audio. Unlike their Betamax verses VHS video cassettes of LONG ago. Yet, aside from Classical music, most music labels do not make SACDs. DVD-Audio initially spread to many formats of music, then dwindled. I had bought exactly one: Henry Mancini's score to The Pink Panther film.

HDCD, unlike SACD and DVD-Audio, is not a separate format. It is encoded right into the music CD and all a player needs is the added HDCD chip inside to decode it. Players with the HDCD chip supposedly make all CDs sound better.

"What makes sound 'better'?", you ask? Well, I admit I do not have "golden ears" but I do detect a more robust sound, more realistic and a deeper and wider soundstage. Soundstage is the audible illusion of "seeing" the singers and musical instruments in their respective places on the stage. Also, good equipment will make sounds seem to be further to the right or left of the space where the speakers are. Also height can be expanded as well. I've experienced all of that. But then, I've been doing this for more than forty years.

One thing, most SACD discs are HYBRID, they have multiple layers. As mentioned the CD has large openings to their pits, so the SACD layer(s) are beneath them since the SACD laser beam is much smaller than the CD laser is.

What prompted me to bid on a newer version of the OPPO universal player was this SACD:
It is the most recently made SACD in my collection. Aaron Copland (pronounced cope-land) is one of my favorite composers and I have many dozens of his recordings by many orchestras over many decades and many formats. He was an American composer and one of the most successful and prolific.....I was going to type "of this Century", but it was the 20th Century he lived and composed in. 
What was different with this SACD is the player would pause at different places in the music, when there should not be any pauses. Very frustrating. But only this SACD.

I have had MANY players, as I said, sometimes re-buying the same model! The one I JUST replaced this week (first week of December, 2016) was an OPPO DV-970HD. OPPO is one of the most revered players for both video and audio quality AND some of the most affordable as well. Another reason I wanted to replace is it because it is silver and the front actually is a mirror. All that shininess in an otherwise black world of equipment bothered my OCD self. I'm only slightly OCD. Stop laughing, Nancy! She is too, but in different ways than I. So here is that OPPO:

You can see some of the formats printed on it. One thing that really BOTHERS me about the stickers than manufacturers put on their electronic products for display purposes that list the specs or features of those devices, when I see someone with a camera or whatever that STILL has the stickers on it, I want to go over there and remove them! OK, calm. I'm calm. For instance, the PC I am typing this on had all kinds of stickers on it's face when we got it. I removed all except the "Graphics by ATi", "Designed for Windows XP" and "AMD Sempron" stickers. They are designed to stay there. I upgraded this to Windows 7 and now 10. It's still going strong.

Here is what I am using now, it is an OPPO DV-981HD and as you can see, all black. The images don't look quite so good as the silver one because the sunlight in the listening room in the morning is indirect and the light in here is direct. The house faces East. 
One can barely see the blue light around the central button and blue display it has. 
While HDCD is not printed on this one, it does decode them. The two main differences is this one will up-scale DVDs to 1080P and it does not have analog component video outputs. Plus it does send SACD multi-channel output through HDMI. Something SONY doesn't like as they are afraid any digital output of SACD music means someone could copy SACD discs. But as far as I know, that is not possible since no one ever made a SACD recorder or blank discs.

Since I have your attention, I am loading one picture of each other player capable of playing SACDs that I have had over the years below:
Above and below are DENON DVD-2910 in silver and black.

 Above is a DENON DVD-2500 which I think is NOT a SACD player.
 Above is a DENON DVD-2800. HDCDs, yes, SACDs no.
 Above is another black DENON DVD-2910.
 And yet another black DENON DVD-2910 above.
  Above is another silver OPPO, but I can't quite read the model number. Possibly DV-971H.
 Another OPPO above, this a DV-970HD. It is missing the cover on the right front.
 Above, an OPPO DV-970H which does not do SACDs.
 Above is the first of the several SONY SACD five disc changers. Called SCD-CE775.
Another SONY, this one a SCD-CE595 with one of those STICKERS I told you about!
And the third and final of the same model SONY changer, another SCD-CE595.
A SAMSUNG universal player called DVD-HD950.
 The SONY above is also a 5-disc changer but for DVDs too. DVP-NC875V is the number. STICKER!
 Above another SONY DVD called: DVP-NC875V.
Another SONY DVD changer, but I can't read the model number. Different one, though.
Yet another SONY, a silver DVP-NS775V.
This SONY was a subject of a post back when I found it at Salvation Army. Got it for $7.95, I think. It cost well over $1,000 when new. BIG, HEAVY and EARLY called: DVP-S9000ES.
 Here's a change above, it is a TOSHIBA universal player called: SD-4960.
Believe it or not, the YAMAHA above is the last one! It is a model number: DVD-S2300MK2. Very nice one, too. Obscure yet very well regarded and no remotes to be found, but with my Logitech Harmony 650 programmable remote control, that is no problem.

In my defense, the vast majority of these were thrift store finds so not much outlay to get them. The big-name makers, SONY and Marantz and others make larger and much more expensive players and of course Blu-Ray players, as well. Yes, OPPO Blu-Ray players too have taken over. Which is why cast off DVD universal players can be had for a song. Or in reality a fraction of their original cost.

The OPPO DV-981HD played that Copland SACD without pause at all. So, $45.55 well spent and bought via eBay. Twenty-two players altogether. WHEW!

I stopped haunting thrift stores, flea markets and yard sales because I really love all the equipment I have in the listening room. Nancy is laughing again, I can feel it. But I really am happy with the sound. Took a lot of years and way more equipment than the 22 shown here to get there, but now I can simply enjoy the amazing sound of music played as well as I can afford.

Thanks for looking,

Scott   

There's something about seeing your name in print....UPDATE

Author's note: I have updated this article on April 22, 2017. My favorite car magazine: Hemmings SPORTS & EXOTIC CAR ceased publishing with issue #141. I sat down and went through all the issues which I saved in special cases, and found three missing! Being the type of collector called "completist" that just would not do. Thankfully, they have back issues of all 141. So, I ordered the lost ones. Once they arrived, I sat down again and decided to quickly look through all the "Reader's Replies" as they called them. In the back of my mind I just KNEW there was one in there with a letter of mine. I found it! Issue #72, August, 2011. It is placed in chronological order below. I briefly thought of redoing the entire post by scanning each cover and letter's pages, then reality hit: WAY too much work!

Gentle reader,

I think most people like the idea of being famous, at least a little bit famous. What I do and countless millions of others do by blogging is essentially self publishing their work. That's one of the reasons E-books have taken off. No printing costs.

I subscribe to a lot of magazines. Real, paper magazines. So many in fact, that the industry must think that I am in some kind of profession that requires keeping up via print media. I say that because I get crazy discount subscription prices and they often keep renewing them for free.

Obviously I have no problem talking (too much, my best buddy tells me) and writing, in this case to people I will likely never see or get to know. That's why I love it when you leave comments. We can have a little more personal relationship.

Plus, like elbows, which everyone has, I have opinions. Apparently others do like what I write. I know this, because when I write to editors of some of the magazines that I read, they publish my letters. I have kept those issue and thought, why not share with you?

The first time a magazine, called Excellence, published a letter of mine, I was shocked and pleased.  Excellence is a magazine for Porsche enthusiasts and owners. At the time, I had my first, and hopefully not my only, Porsche. It was a 1987 924S. The 924S was a then latest effort on Porsche's part to sell an entry level model. Slated to retail for $19,995 when they came out in Fall of 1986. A bargain in Porsche terms. As was mine, as you will see.....
The 924S is a Porsche 924 body with 944 mechanical components. I'm talking engine, suspension, brakes, wheels, etc. No more Audi-sourced engine, rear drum brakes, four-bolt wheels and VW-sourced other parts. Being lighter and more aerodynamic, it is faster and quicker (there is a difference) than the same model year 944 models are.
Excellence had an article about a recent PCA (Porsche Club of America) get together and one show winner's car was featured. They referred to it as a 944. It was, in fact a 924S. So I wrote to them and they published my entire letter and apologized to the owner of the 924S featured.

For some reason, I did not keep that issue and since I have no idea which one it was.....never mind.

NOTE: All photographs and words are the copyright of the photographers and authors and are used for illustrative purposes only. I do not benefit from their work.

(You know how you tend not to see something because it is always there? I have a wonderful EPSON photo scanner. It is sitting mere inches from me right now. And yet, it never crossed my mind to SCAN these covers and letters....unit today. Those scans will appear at the bottom of this post.)

In the case of the pictures of the letters pages, you'll have to scroll or look around to find the ones by me.

So, starting with the first issue I did keep, dated August 25th, 2008, this issue of AutoWeek magazine.
To make it easier to see the actual letters, I am making those pages full sized. My letter is on the lower right. Of course, Volkswagen did not choose to make this modern take on the Volkswagen-Porsche 914. Too bad.
Next, again in AutoWeek this one dated October 13, 2008. Funny that they included the much maligned Dodge Caliber in the fun rides list.
This time my letter is first. True too. NASCAR sucks.
A superb magazine as all Hemming's titles are, SPORTS & EXOTIC CAR is one I have subscribed to since issue #1. It features fun cars from many eras, unlike most mainline car magazines. Well written and illustrated.
My letter starts in the left column and ends in the right one. A little history you didn't know about.
Next, a pair of Euro-centric car magazines. Owning the fabulous Audi TT started my subscription to eurotuner and european car.
Interestingly, both issues are from the same month, January, 2009, although they are competing titles, they both had "me" in them. I highlighted the text on the page below at the time I noticed it. More history you may not know. Funny, since I now own a Volvo turbo wagon. Not the V70R, but it's little brother.
Here's the other one.
This one had nothing to do with cars. european car and a sister publication had their last page titled: Icon. That month's was GIJoe. This January, 2009 icon was the Airstream trailer.
Back to AUTOWEEK and their new look, dated December 14, 2009.
I did in fact keep that special Audi issue. My letter is the "feature" one this time.
MISSING issue and letter is here:
Back to SPORTS & EXOTIC CAR from August, 2001 which features a very pretty Fiat X1/9 mid-engined sports car on the cover.
My letter is quite long and they did not edit it at all. More than a whole column, it starts below the picture:
 

Only three months later SPORTS & EXOTIC CAR from November, 2001 published me again. That Volvo now has more than 3,000,000 miles and is still going strong. Back when Volvos were not boxy.
My letter is first in line. Again.
Hemmings once again printed a letter in the August, 2014 issue.
 This one is in the left column. I still want a Triumph GT6.

Now to the most recent car magazine printing and the first in Automobile. August, 2016. 
My letter is headlined "THANKS, BUT NO". 
I have a virtual version of the last air-cooled Porsche in my virtual garage in Forza 4. Of the models of which they featured as "affordable", I saw one for sale in a parking lot. White with blue leather interior. Manual transmission, great shape and I couldn't believe how cheap. The point is moot, (or as my ex-wife often said, "The point is mute." Perhaps she was subtly telling me to shut up?) I could not afford it.

I learned the lesson that so many buyers of "previously enjoyed" (my term) German cars: Got that ten-year-old (insert German car name here) for only ten grand? Well, when it needs work it is still a forty grand car. My 2000 Audi TT taught me that. Most repairs, no matter how simple still are quoted in four figures. Fun and awesome though they are, unless you can afford to pay for repairs and maintenance on that fun and/or exotic car, walk away. Just walk away.

I am a photographer and was an avid camera collector. As if you didn't already know that! POPULAR PHOTOGRAPHY had an article titled "Elegant Machines". I felt the need to write to the editor:

On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 10:07 PM, Scott Robb wrote:

Dear MS Leuchter,
    I have been a reader of your magazine for decades. It was frustrating however, because raising a family of four kids took precedent, so I couldn't afford a "real" (35mm SLR) camera, until April, 1995. Soon after, I decided to collect cameras as well. I had a mentor in the form of the late Colonel, Bill Arps, US Army, retired, whose massive collection took up his entire large basement. I helped him and later his widow to sell his collection, one camera or lens at a time. I introduced him to the Internet, and he would follow my sales. He once told me, "You described it so well I wanted to buy it myself. And it was my camera!" I still miss Colonel Bill.
    So, I was delighted to see Elegant Machines by Theano Nikitas in the September issue. I still have articles that I cut out and kept from previous decades such as SLR notebook by Herbert Keppler and the camera collector, later called ASK THE COLLECTOR by aptly named Jason Schneider. Both writers were instrumental in choosing my collection which is considerably smaller than it once was and can be seen in my blog: The Robb Collections: I haven't written about the cameras in a while: Aires, Kiev, Zorki....and Family
    Seeing that card in the mailbox announcing the upcoming camera show was such a exciting delight. What a feast for the senses seeing and handling SO MANY cameras and lenses all in one or two rooms at a local hotel. But as time went by the room numbers decreased as did the number of tables and sellers. The one word repeatedly heard was the reason, "ebay." Frankly, the first time I'd heard of ebay was an ad in your competition. It showed an old camera on an otherwise blank page and "www.ebay.com". That was in 1998. One look at the site and I was hooked. Not only did ebay kill camera shows, it also killed independent camera shops. Much as the Internet did to record stores. Progress isn't always a good thing.

    Well mentioned in the article is the cost of film and developing. I still have film in the freezer, and ache to use it, but for the after-the-shots costs. Plus, gone too are local places to get film developed and printed. The real fun of film is not knowing how the shots are going to turn out. Many times ,years ago, going through the prints caused me to think, "I made this? Wow!" As pointed out in the article, the immediacy of digital has killed the mystery. I used formats from sub-miniature to large in the guise of a Busch Pressman 4X5 camera my father-in-law gave me. Always the excitement of picking up the prints and opening the envelope in the car because I couldn't wait to see how the pictures turned out.

    If only there could be a resurgence in film, Lomo is trying, like there is in analog sound, that is LP records, whose manufacture and sales climbs every year. The key is inexpensive and convenient developing and printing. If not printing, at least good sized images on CD or DVD so one can print the ones they want. Being the leading photography magazine, maybe you can start the revolution. Thinking back, I always preferred the pictures with white borders. Looking at them was kind of like framed art or more modern, the frame around your monitor. The white separated the slice of time and place from the reality of the present. 

    Keep up the good work and I'll keep reading and subscribing.

Scott Robb
Didn't I tell you at the beginning that I like to talk and write? She e-mailed me write back and said:
"On 8/22/2016 7:04 PM, Miriam Leuchter wrote:
Dear Mr. Robb,

Thank you so much for your letter. I always love hearing reminiscences like yours, and I share your sense of wonder, even in this digital age, of looking at a good print and thinking, "I made this? Wow!" 

We've noticed a strong interest in film among our younger readers, particularly online, where photographers who grew up in the digital era seem hungry for information and encouragement. So you can expect to see us continue to cover analog photography from time to time.

We won't have room to publish you full letter in our Your Turn column, but I'll try to fit in a part of it—probably the first paragraph and a bit of the second, if that is OK with you.

Yours,

Miriam"


Miriam Leuchter
Editor-in-Chief
Popular Photography and American Photo
2 Park Avenue, 9th floor
New York, NY  10016
+1 212 779 5463
MY response to her was:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Scott Robb wrote:
Miriam,
    Thanks for your kind reply. It surprised and pleased me that you would take the time to write. I would be honored if you published my letter! Oh, by the way, I was also a Shutterbug subscriber for a long time, but your mag won out as to my continued reading and enjoying.
    You all are doing a great job and no matter how long one has been making pictures, there's always something to learn in Pop-Photo.
Thanks,
Scott 
To which she replied:
Thank you so much, Scott!

Rather than cut your letter to ribbons, I decided to hold it for a month and try to fit at least a chunk of it into the November issue. 

Miriam

Miriam Leuchter
Editor-in-Chief
Popular Photography and American Photo
2 Park Avenue, 9th floor
New York, NY  10016
+1 212 779 5463
See how this all works? You write (not TEXT) to someone and they write back. Even someone as busy as the editor of a well regarded national publication feels it is necessary to personally reply to a subscriber and then publish at least what she could fit in a following issue. Here is the cover of THAT issue:
ISN'T that an amazing photograph! Such colors. Nature is truly wonderful! Below is her editorial for that issue and her photograph.
Below is the portion of my letter that she could squeeze in. For which I am very grateful.
So, that was the first non-automotive magazine to publish my words. The title "Editor" is very true. BELOW is the cover to one of the "High end" audio publications that I subscribe to. I cannot afford the vast majority of what they review and advertise, but it is still interesting, nonetheless.
I had written to this magazine as well, never expecting to have it published. So, when I turned to page 10, I stopped and thought, "Did I just see my name?" Well, I did:
Despite what I said, my frugal Scottish roots would prevent me from actually spending five figures on a couple of pieces of stereo equipment. I wrote to the editor to thank him for publishing my letter and he replied:
"Hi Scott,

Thanks for the note. It was in interesting letter.


Best regards,
Robert"
So, there you have it. Most of the letters of mine that others felt merited publication.
Thanks for looking,
Scott  

The 500th Article Of The Robb Collections! Thanks To All Of You! Indexes To All Categories!

  October 24, 2024 #500 Gentle reader, First of all, THANK YOU for taking the time to read my writing and viewing my images! This article, s...